For the love of God why?

| 4 Comments

Nearly everyone who lives in DC has been to the National Cathedral. My high school used to have it's baccalaureate there, and the choir got to sing from the normal place behind the sanctuary. Even if the speeches were boring, you could still sit there and marvel at the beauty of the place.

So with that experience in mind: there's something very disheartening about seeing the former president of Iran speaking from a pulpit at there. And I'm hardpressed to think about what anyone at the Cathedral would think could be gained by this.

See for yourself:

Full article in the Washington Times.

4 Comments

That cathedral belongs to my former denomination; what more would you expect? When we visited D.C. a few years ago, we passed on the cathedral and took in the (Catholic) Shrine of the Immaculate Conception. It was a good decision.

And I thought the Episcopalian establishment was too left-wing to support nuclear power!

The Episcopal Church is down in membership, but not out as far as being able to do the outrageous.

I wonder whether Mr. Khatami would be willing to appear on the same platform with the lady who currently holds the office of Episcopal Bishop of Washington.

Leave a comment

What? Who?

On life and living in communion with the Catholic Church.

Richard Chonak

John Schultz


You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.

Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by John Schultz published on September 8, 2006 3:24 PM.

Well, that proves they're in on it! was the previous entry in this blog.

Bad church names is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.