A Federal bankruptcy judge in an Oregon case has ruled that parish property belongs to the Portland Archdiocese, adding to the possibility that some of that property will have to be liquidated to pay abuse victims.
The deluge resumes
Categories:
4 Comments
Leave a comment
What? Who?
On life and living in communion with the Catholic Church.
John Schultz
You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.
John Schultz
You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.
Categories
- Administration (29)
- Amusements (184)
- Apparitions and Mystical Phenomena (29)
- Art & Architecture (31)
- Arts & Culture (101)
- Bishops (23)
- Canonical (56)
- Catechesis (10)
- Controversies (201)
- Culture War (150)
- Devotions (53)
- Education (29)
- Ethics (26)
- Evangelization (30)
- Events (17)
- Evocative (10)
- Food (9)
- History (23)
- Language (4)
- Legion of Christ/ Regnum Christi (97)
- Liturgy and Music (161)
- Marriage & Family (50)
- Ministry (82)
- Odd & POD (3)
- Odds & Ends (141)
- On the 'net (9)
- Other Christians (35)
- Other religions (22)
- Personal (121)
- Photography (4)
- Picky, Picky (18)
- Politics (279)
- Pop Culture (20)
- Pro-Life (78)
- Saints, Blesseds, and other Holy People (10)
- Spirituality (21)
- The Fringe (45)
- The News (97)
- The Press (13)
- The Working World (3)
- Theology (12)
- Tongue-in-cheek (1)
- Vatican-watching (4)
Monthly Archives
- January 2010 (10)
- December 2009 (5)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (9)
- September 2009 (65)
- August 2009 (47)
- July 2009 (4)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (2)
- April 2009 (10)
- March 2009 (6)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (9)
- December 2008 (10)
- November 2008 (5)
- October 2008 (10)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (14)
- June 2008 (16)
- May 2008 (12)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (10)
- February 2008 (6)
- January 2008 (6)
- December 2007 (10)
- November 2007 (13)
- October 2007 (14)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (11)
- July 2007 (11)
- June 2007 (12)
- May 2007 (21)
- April 2007 (8)
- March 2007 (14)
- February 2007 (14)
- January 2007 (15)
- December 2006 (22)
- November 2006 (24)
- October 2006 (30)
- September 2006 (21)
- August 2006 (29)
- July 2006 (26)
- June 2006 (36)
- May 2006 (36)
- April 2006 (39)
- March 2006 (41)
- February 2006 (38)
- January 2006 (40)
- December 2005 (28)
- November 2005 (36)
- October 2005 (41)
- September 2005 (45)
- August 2005 (56)
- July 2005 (36)
- June 2005 (46)
- May 2005 (46)
- April 2005 (66)
- March 2005 (51)
- February 2005 (54)
- January 2005 (78)
- December 2004 (72)
- November 2004 (103)
- October 2004 (88)
- September 2004 (80)
- August 2004 (117)
- July 2004 (136)
- June 2004 (137)
- May 2004 (89)
- April 2004 (56)
- March 2004 (79)
- February 2004 (62)
- January 2004 (70)
- December 2003 (62)
- November 2003 (68)
- October 2003 (96)
- September 2003 (93)
- August 2003 (98)
- July 2003 (119)
- June 2003 (81)
- May 2003 (95)
- April 2003 (79)
- March 2003 (87)
- February 2003 (79)
- January 2003 (86)
- December 2002 (112)
- November 2002 (98)
- October 2002 (164)
- September 2002 (112)
- August 2002 (78)
- July 2002 (87)
- June 2002 (135)
- May 2002 (134)
Pages
OpenID accepted here
Learn more about OpenID
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Richard Chonak published on December 31, 2005 4:41 AM.
If you have to buy one, it doesn't count was the previous entry in this blog.
Who owns the parish? is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Does this ruling now potentially put the diocese in conflict with some provision of Canon Law? Somewhere I read the assets of a particular parish belong to the parish (perhaps this is in relationship to the fiasco in St. Louis). Your resident canon lawyer might have fodder for a post now, if he hasn't covered this ground already.
It's a shame this case wasn't handled as well and as amicably as the one here in Tucson.
Not to ignore the shameful acts of homosexual priests having their way with teenage boys from Catholic families which had been taught to trust their parish priest no matter what, but...
...this sure looks to me like good old American anti-Catholicism, with roots as old as the presence of Europeans in Massachussetts, is now actually going to shut down some Catholic parishes, and I don't like it a bit.
Doug Barber - No, MA is not going to shut down a single parish. They're going to take the buildings away, the cars away, the property of all types away. The decision to shut down the parish will be the bishop's and his alone. On Sunday, the priest should gather the flock and they should celebrate the mass with whatever they have, wherever they can gather. If nowhere else, I suggest the steps of their former church.
The priest can suggest digging deep for rent money for a hall while the parish regroups and starts the hard journey to buying new property to replace the old so thoughtlessly squandered by a bunch of perverts but the parish endures so long as the faithful remain and the bishop does not suppress them.
I have lived and prayed in parishes without their own property for decades. That happens to Eastern Catholics more frequently than Western ones but there's no exclusivity about it.