Given the title, I'm forced to wonder if Maureen Dowd is really necessary...
1 Comment
Leave a comment
What? Who?
On life and living in communion with the Catholic Church.
Richard Chonak
John Schultz
You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.
Richard Chonak
John Schultz
You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.
Categories
- Administration (29)
- Amusements (189)
- Apparitions and Mystical Phenomena (59)
- Art & Architecture (31)
- Arts & Culture (101)
- Bad behavior (2)
- Bishops (25)
- Canonical (62)
- Catechesis (11)
- Controversies (208)
- Culture War (151)
- Devotions (54)
- Education (29)
- Ethics (26)
- Evangelization (30)
- Events (17)
- Evocative (10)
- Food (10)
- History (24)
- Language (5)
- Legion of Christ/ Regnum Christi (178)
- Liturgy and Music (170)
- Marriage & Family (50)
- Ministry (83)
- Odd & POD (3)
- Odds & Ends (141)
- On the 'net (9)
- Other Christians (37)
- Other religions (22)
- Personal (120)
- Photography (4)
- Picky, Picky (19)
- Politics (280)
- Pop Culture (20)
- Pro-Life (79)
- Saints, Blesseds, and other Holy People (12)
- Spirituality (22)
- The Fringe (46)
- The News (97)
- The Press (15)
- The Working World (3)
- Theology (14)
- Tongue-in-cheek (2)
- Vatican-watching (5)
stblogs.org
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by John Schultz published on November 5, 2005 12:00 PM.
School's no-blogging policy exaggerated? was the previous entry in this blog.
Archaeologists Discover Ancient Church is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
MoDo isn't necessary at all -- she was just a replacement for Anna Quindlen. The NYT needed a pro-abortion pseudo-Catholic woman, and she fit the quota.
That article you linked to was nauseating. Maybe years ago she was original, but now Dowd is just like the Times' other columnists: reflexively liberal, loose with the facts, and stylistically ho-hum.