Column by Maggie Gallagher. A snippet:

Democrats complain the marriage issue is divisive. By that they mean it divides the majority of Democratic voters from some key special interests of their party, who provide money and manpower. If Democrats would do what the majority of their constituents tell pollsters they want -- protect the normal definition of marriage as the union of husband and wife -- marriage would not be a divisive issue; it would unite the great majority of Americans from both parties, and all races and ethnic groups. (The majority of African-Americans are particularly upset at the framing of same-sex marriage as a civil rights issue.)

Same-sex marriage activists know that their path to victory lies in confusing the issue, keeping the discussion on anything but marriage itself -- the sacred constitution, discrimination, hate, federalism -- to silence the public and let courts do their political work for them. So Democrats in Congress are pinned between the money and the votes.

2 Comments

Shouldn't that be "amendment" and not "ammendment"?

The democratic party is totally controlled by....who could it be.....I wonder....could it be.....SATAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (C.L.)

What? Who?

On life and living in communion with the Catholic Church.

Richard Chonak

John Schultz


You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.

Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Sal published on July 20, 2004 7:24 AM.

Father Stanley Jaki on ethics in our time was the previous entry in this blog.

Burger Fan Wolfs Down 20,000th Big Mac is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.