We don't want your kind here
Categories:
5 Comments
What? Who?
On life and living in communion with the Catholic Church.
Richard Chonak
John Schultz
You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.
Richard Chonak
John Schultz
You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.
Categories
- Administration (29)
- Amusements (189)
- Apparitions and Mystical Phenomena (59)
- Art & Architecture (31)
- Arts & Culture (101)
- Bad behavior (2)
- Bishops (25)
- Canonical (62)
- Catechesis (11)
- Controversies (208)
- Culture War (151)
- Devotions (54)
- Education (29)
- Ethics (26)
- Evangelization (30)
- Events (17)
- Evocative (10)
- Food (10)
- History (24)
- Language (5)
- Legion of Christ/ Regnum Christi (178)
- Liturgy and Music (170)
- Marriage & Family (50)
- Ministry (83)
- Odd & POD (3)
- Odds & Ends (141)
- On the 'net (9)
- Other Christians (37)
- Other religions (22)
- Personal (120)
- Photography (4)
- Picky, Picky (19)
- Politics (280)
- Pop Culture (20)
- Pro-Life (79)
- Saints, Blesseds, and other Holy People (12)
- Spirituality (22)
- The Fringe (46)
- The News (97)
- The Press (15)
- The Working World (3)
- Theology (14)
- Tongue-in-cheek (2)
- Vatican-watching (5)
stblogs.org
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Richard Chonak published on April 17, 2004 11:36 AM.
Novena to the Divine Mercy was the previous entry in this blog.
New Church etiquette rules is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
ack...i posted same at summa mamas. i knew i shoulda read me some cathlik laht first!
is it just me or is the hypocrisy just fabulously droll dahling?
That's awful. It's good to see, from the last couple of paragraphs of the article, that not all gay people agree with that decision.
Frankly, apart from whatever local Key West ordinance may have been violated, I don't have a problem with this. If that particular hostelry wants to market itself as "gay only" or whatever, they're welcome to do so -- provided that it works both ways.
I do think, though, that they should make their policy clear when folks make reservations, so that no one is inconvenienced.
I'm sure the ACLU will get right on this.
Q: If Christians maintain their right not to do business which would promote or condone homosexuality, shouldn't the reverse be permissable? . . . what I mean is, what if this were a hotel run by a Christian hotel owner, who had a problem hosting a gay couple; would he be entitled to this kind of action? Why or why not?
Not sure exactly where to stand on this -- the conflict btw/ 'non-discrimination' and the right to decide with whom to do business with . . . interested in hearing your thoughts.