Bret Stephens, editor in chief of the Jerusalem Post, outlines his reasons for being a Clinton hater. The occasion was a birthday party for Shimon Peres, where Clinton bemoaned the lack of peace in the Mideast, and sang John Lennon's atheist anthem "Imagine." The lyrics are below:
Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today...Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace...You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as oneImagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world...
Does he really believe this dreck? Would the good folks in Arkansas who elected him 392 times to state office agree that "no religion" is an ideal world? Would the plurality of U.S. voters who put him in office supported the elimination of the nation-state?
Of course not. He's one of the Hollow Men, the Men without Chests, the Last Men, the New Class. He will pick up an instrument of traditional religion -- the Bible -- and without a hint of shame carry it into church while surrounded by the press. Then a few years later he'll turn up at a party and start singing about how traditional religion is an enemy of peace and mankind. If you point out the inconsistency, you are a fool, a rube. You don't get the postmodern joke: Clinton dwells in Nietzsche's land beyond good and evil, where there is no standard with which to evaluate him except how good his performance is. Consistency is for absolutists, and absolutists are the kind of people John Lennon hates, people who believe in religion, possessions, countries, and all the rest. They're the only real enemies.
Bill Clinton keeps on going, never in a state of being, always in a state of becoming. He's still got some game left -- his wife must be elected president, and he's flailing around trying to codify his "legacy." Let Stephens have the last word:
...there never was a "President Clinton." There were, instead, two incarnations of Candidate Clinton: first the challenger, then the incumbent. In both cases, no such thing as "policy" could be said to exist; Mr. Clinton moved where political convenience dictated.
Couldn't have said it better.
Although I think Clinton might truly enjoy the notion of no accountability to a holy and just Creator.
Imagine no John Lennon
As if he never was:
No atheistic anthems
No ranting for a cause
Imagine all that airtime
Filled with calm and peace
Imagine Yoko's no-one
I see I made you smile
Don't wanna hear her whining
She hasn't any style
Suppose we'd never seen them
in Holland or in bed
It was vain to imagine
Without God a man were free
I wonder if he knows now
Just how wrong a man can be
Many Many years ago, people left their homelands to look for a better life. Somewhere where they weren't persecuted for their beliefs. Some left homelands because of the leadership of their home country was oppressive or subversive or ------ name it.
I imagine Hilary in the Oval office with Bill as the first lady - I wonder if that's the straw that'll break some backs.
Oh, I'm not complaining about the US - I can't imagine leaving. I'm not sure if the grass is greener anywhere in the world. But I also can't imagine living in a country that is so devoid of values that the majority of its citizens would elect the Clintons again.
cathy,
A majority of Americans never elected Bill Clinton in the first place, so the adverb "again" was incorrect. Both in '92 and '96 he won with a plurality of the vote, not a majority (i.e., he got more voted than any other candidate, but not %50). At least as far as the popular vote is concerned; the electoral college is another matter.