Is Consumers Union supporting the gay agenda?


The magazine Consumer Reports has done good service for a long time, and I've been willing to support them by subscribing to their print edition and also their on-line service. Like most organizations in the field of consumer activism, they have a somewhat left-wing image, and occasionally, they endorse or lobby for legislation I don't agree with, but I haven't been bothered much. Until now.

This year, they bought the blog, formerly owned by Gawker; it has a flock of writers spewing out several short pieces a day, some of them on legitimate consumer issues, and some on irrelevancies. Since the writers at Consumerist tend to be a snarky opinionated bunch, I figured their style might eventually become a problem, in comparison with the restrained, generally fair and factual approach of the magazine.

In recent weeks, they've given a lot of coverage to some gay group's protest against Target stores after Target gave a donation to a political cause in Minnesota. The donation was ostensibly given because the cause agreed with Target's business interests, but it benefited a conservative politician who's against same-sex marriage. Since then, Consumerist has published several pieces about protests:

  • July 28: "Target Angering Gay Customers..."
  • August 5: "Target CEO Explains Support of Anti-Gay Politician..."
  • August 8: "Target and Best Buy's Support of Bigots Is Going To Change The Way You Shop"

(Yeah, actually it will change the way I shop: I like Target more now. Their foundation used to support Planned Parenthood, but they stopped. God bless 'em.)

I figure the first story was reasonable; the second understandable; but the third insulting.

Does Consumers Union, the parent organization of, endorse that sentiment: that opposition to same-sex marriage makes you a "bigot"? I don't want my subscription money going to pay for a blog that's going to spread incivility like that.

So I called Consumers Union, spoke with the customer relations department, and explained my concern a week ago. I haven't heard any response yet, so I cancelled the magazine subscription. I'll give 'em another chance this week; I'll call again and ask if they have taken a stand to disassociate themselves from the offensive message from the blog. And if not, I'll cancel the on-line subscription.

Anybody else feel the same?


Sadly, the reason both sides ( pro-family and contra- family) resort to targeting Target or any other retailer is because we now define ourselves by our consumerism culture. I applaud boycotts of offending stores, mind you. It is simply a "sign of the times" that the battleground is Commercial USA.

Great article!

Definition of Bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially one who regards or treats the members of a group with hatred and intolerance.

So yes, by definition your intolerance of same sex marriage does make you a bigot.

What Would Jesus Do?

So, you're ok with gay marriage personally but oppose it as matter of public policy? Is that the No Homo Doctrine?

Leave a comment

What? Who?

On life and living in communion with the Catholic Church.

Richard Chonak

John Schultz

You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Richard Chonak published on August 22, 2010 1:19 AM.

Haven't we all had a teacher like this? was the previous entry in this blog.

Little pink shoes is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.