March 2009 Archives

To pick up where I left off a few days ago: Cardinal O'Malley is having the National Catholic Bioethics Center review a deal that the Catholic hospital system Caritas Christi has made with the state government here in Massachusetts.

On the face of it, the plan is a scandal. Still, I'm hoping the immoral aspects of the deal can be corrected, so that for the sake of everyone involved, Caritas could participate in the state program on a legitimate basis.

I'm figuring that the moral problems with the situation are in these areas:

(1) Did Caritas solicit Centene (the company joining them in the project) to set up an abortion-providing insurance plan? If so, that appears to be plainly wrong. Would it be a personal fault by Caritas officials or would it vitiate the plan totally, so that it would remain morally tainted even if other aspects are "corrected"?

(2) Caritas is willingly a part-owner of the new CFHP (joint venture with Centene's subsidiary Celtic Insurance), which will administer the plan and provide abortion coverage as the state contract requires. I doubt that this ownership can be justified under any circumstances. Can Caritas "correct" this aspect by divesting itself of its share in CFHP?

(3) Caritas is, according to its statements in the press, already complying with state rules in a related matter: they give out "Department of Public Health information" on "emergency contraception" to rape victims, as required by law. Does that distinction reflect a difference that makes it morally tolerable?

(4) Can Caritas hospitals and physicians, as a subcontractor to CFHP, comply with the state-imposed contractual requirement to give abortion info? Do their contracts with other insurance companies have the same requirement? Are the hospitals already complying? Can the compliance be fulfilled in some minimalistic way that doesn't violate moral norms? If all the insurance contracts require it, and there is no morally licit way to fulfill the requirement, then I don't see how Caritas can continue to operate.

[Note: I know this is a hot-button topic, so commenters should be on notice. Comments that in my opinion cross the line will be removed. --RC]

The Patriarch of Georgia was concerned about the low birth rate in that Caucasus nation, so he offered to be the godfather for any third child born to a Georgian family. Swiftly the nation's birth rate shot up 20% and the Patriarch found himself godfather to over 2,000 children whose baptisms he performed!

(source: BBC: scroll down for the story)

Boston Catholic Television, the little diocesan-owned cable service here, has had viewers outside of Massachusetts for a long time: it was carried on cable systems in neighboring states and as far away as Montreal for years. It lived off donations from the "shut-ins" who were its main viewers, and its production values were on par with a good public-access show.

Now they want to expand their audience and present themselves nationally in a more serious way. They've dropped the "Boston" from their title and are billing themselves as simply "Catholic TV". The sets are looking better, and the director, Fr. Robert Reed, shows a bit of humor in his presentation. They're feeding the service to more cable systems and streaming their video over the net.

Well, good enough: there's certainly room out there in the US media world for another Catholic cable service in addition to EWTN.

Now they've hired a publicist to promote their website to bloggers.

Ahem. This screenshot shows what video on the site looks like:

For some reason, they think nobody will notice or mind that the video they're streaming is being stretched horizontally by 33% to fill the display box. I mean, Fr. Hesburgh -- the mover and shaker who made Notre Dame what it is today (sigh) -- is no glamour plate, but he's not as unsightly as they're making him in that image. No, really.

The technical reason for this is that standard TV images form a rectangle with a 4-to-3 ratio of width to length. HDTV video has a wider 16-to-9 aspect ratio. CTV apparently wanted the fancy new wide format on their website, but their actual programming is in the standard format. To make it fit, they are, in Procrustean fashion, stretching the h*ll out of their video: making it 33% wider than it should be, and figuring that the viewers will just put up with it.

Great media savvy, guys. It really proves you're ready for the big time.

Mm, no. The correct way to convert 4x3 video into 16x9 video is to "letterbox" it. That is, you make it wider by adding empty space to the left and right of the image. Conversely, to convert 16x9 video into 4x3 format, you'd add empty space to the top and bottom of the image.

What is wrong with these people? The site has been like this since it debuted in October. Do the clergy in Boston think that they can make things better by issuing press releases instead of curing problems?

Hey, don't answer that!

Since our blog neighbor Fr. Jeffrey Keyes, C.PP.S. of Rifugio San Gaspare was giving a mission in Connecticut this week, and because the parish hosting him offered a Solemn Mass for St. Joseph's feast day, there were two beautiful reasons to visit St. Mary's Church in Norwalk on Thursday.

In an excess of optimism, Fr. Keyes handed me his fancy camera with a huge telephoto lens shortly before the Mass began, but I took only a few pictures, using my own little apparatus instead of his, as I have a policy against trying to operate cameras that weigh more than my head. If any more of the snaps are usable, I'll post them here or he'll post them on his blog; we'll work something out.

Update: The rest of the photos from the day (including a few snapshots from my phone) are on Facebook.

Lately here in Boston we've had an uproar over the Catholic hospital system Caritas Christi. It's trying to set up an organization to provide health care for low-income people on the state's subsidized insurance plan, Commonwealth Care. At present, there are four relatively small HMOs offering services for Commonwealth Care subscribers, and Caritas' would be a fifth.

There's a serious ethical problem involved, though, because the state requires all the insurance companies administering the Commonwealth Care program to include abortion and contraception coverage.

Understandably pro-life Catholics are -- shall we say -- concerned and want to make sure that Caritas doesn't compromise on medical ethics, or come under state pressure to cooperate with abortions: for example, by referring patients to abortion providers, since it was plain that Caritas would not do them itself.

Caritas teamed up with a for-profit health company called Centene and is forming a joint venture company for the project. When the plan was briefed to state regulators, though, the Centene rep told them that yes, abortions would be provided. The plan would even provide transportation.

Did Caritas think that this would absolve it of responsibility? The arrangement -- at least as it has been reported in the press and in the state government website -- would seem to make Caritas part-owner of a company that provides abortion coverage.

To put it mildly, this didn't give lay pro-lifers much confidence in the ethical competence of the decision makers here in Boston.

It's especially shocking, since the board of directors of Caritas includes several appointees from the Archdiocese, and the priest J. Bryan Hehir, known formerly as a prominent USCC foreign-policy official in the 1980s, is the Archdiocesan liaison to Caritas Christi. Did these worthies know and approve of this disturbing arrangement? Maybe some knew, but apparently some important people didn't know: CWNews.com cited an "informed source" that claimed that the whole deal was a surprise to Cardinal O'Malley.

Well, thanks be to God, good pro-life folks sounded off at the Mass. Citizens for Life and the Mass. Catholic League; and Cardinal O'Malley stepped up to say that the Archdiocese was going to exercise its right to supervise medical ethics issues for Caritas and would veto the deal if it doesn't stay within ethical limits. To assist in making his decision, he'd get the proposal reviewed by the National Catholic Bioethics Center, an organization well trusted among pro-lifers for its strong commitment to Catholic medical ethics.

On Thursday, the state, for their part, approved the deal, and the Cardinal reiterated that unless and until he approved it, it would not go into effect.

And I figured that's about the best one can expect.

But that hasn't been enough for everybody. Some grossly exaggerated rumors have been flying about this case: that within weeks hospital employees would soon be pressured into cooperating with abortions; that the Archdiocese was selling out the Catholic hospital system; that the Cardinal wasn't pro-life even!

Oh, man! More later....

At the parish today, there was a rite of sending the catechumens (and candidates too!) for the Election rite to be held at the cathedral: and, man, was it overdone! Since the books on-line describe it as an "optional" rite, that probably means that some liturgist invented it out of whole cloth.

Here's an excerpt from some old LTP book:

Reverend Father, these catechumens, whom I now present to you, are beginning their final period of preparation and purification leading to their initiation. They have found strength in God's grace and support in our community's prayers and example.

Now they ask that they be recognized for the progress they have made in their spiritual formation and that they receive the assurance of our blessing and prayers as they go forth to the rite of election celebrated this afternoon by Bishop N.

Ugh: "they ask that they be recognized" for their spiritual progress? Thank God I didn't have to go through that indignity as a catechumen.