Ouch.

KERRY CHALLENGES BUSH TO WEEKLY DEBATES: In Anoka, MN, John Kerry challenged President Bush to weekly debates on the issues.
BUSH CAMP REAX: “There will be a time for debates after the convention, and during the next few weeks, John Kerry should take the time to finish the debates with himself. This election presents a clear choice to the American people between a President who is moving America forward and a Senator who has taken every side of almost every issue and has the most out of the mainstream record in the U.S. Senate,” said BC’04 spokesman Steve Schmidt.

The is link to abcnews.com is from Drudge.

Published
Categorized as Politics

Double-standard? Is that you?

Gosh, I haven’t seen you since this morning when I looked at the news!

Democrats are urging Bush to denounce independent campaign ads against Kerry. The latest is Former Georgia Sen. Max Cleland, who went to the President’s Ranch in Crawford, Texas to deliver a letter. No one there would accept it. Max, you don’t need to deliver the letter at all. Just get enough people involved with Kerry’s campaign to scream like banshees about this and Bush will just see it on the news.

By the way, why is Bush denouncing all the activity of the 527’s not good enough for the Kerry campaign? First, because they are a bunch of whining babies. Second, because they are a bunch of whining babies. And third, the 527’s helping the Kerry campaign have spent more than 54 million big ones trashing Bush, while the swiftees have spent a paltry half a million. “Mother” Teresa Heniz-(Kerry) probably owns half a million in shoes.

The media has thousands of litters of kittens over one volunteer for the Bush campaign who has helped the Swiftees. What about all the connections Kerry people have with 527’s like the perfidious ACT and the perfidious-er MoveOn.org?

Don’t cry, Kerry staffers! Mommie will be along with your blankie, your martini, and your mutual fund statement any time now. Just know that it’s your candidate who decided to run on his Vietnam record. Bush didn’t make this an issue.

UPDATE: Letter to Kerry – “You can’t have it both ways.”

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t build your convention and much of your campaign around your service in Vietnam, and then try to say that only those veterans who agree with you have a right to speak up. There is no double standard for our right to free speech. We all earned it.
You said in 1992 “we do not need to divide America over who served and how.” Yet you and your surrogates continue to criticize President Bush for his service as a fighter pilot in the National Guard.

Published
Categorized as Politics

Toasted and jammed

My parents need a new toaster. The toaster they own at present is, in a word, retarded. On the highest setting it barely warms the bread. On the lowest setting I imagine it would be safe to have in the tub with you. The thing has a switch for either toast or bagel which, like Janeane Garofalo participating in political discourse, does absolutely nothing.

I tell my parents they need a new toaster. This is the same thing I have saying at every visit the past two years. Like the issue of above-ground nuclear testing, they say it’s just not a priority for them now. But they have piles of money – why not drop a bit of cash on a new toaster? I think it’s because my dad just can’t go and buy something, he has a special routine for any purchase over ten dollars. Let’s apply his method to the toaster problem.

First, he forms a blue-ribbon commission to investigate the alleged retardedness of the toaster. It consists of dad, mom, and the next-door neighbors, one of whom has celiac disease. She eats only jam, no toast. While I have years of toast-eating experience, I cannot participate in this phase of the project because, thankfully, I am leaving tomorrow.

When the blue-ribbon commission confirms what I have been saying for years, namely, the toaster needs to be taken out back, shot, pounded with a hammer, ground to a fine powder, and mailed to DNC headquarters, it will be time for phase two.

Phase two consist of the feasibility study. Dad painstakingly measures the space available in their newly-remodeled, positively cavernous kitchen for the new toaster, and compares the numbers to the dimensions of all the toasters in the last three decades of the Consumer Reports Buyers Guide. The new kitchen, incidentally, is large enough that one could conduct above-ground nuclear testing by the dishwasher and not even see the explosion at the oven. He compares features among the models that meet the space requirements, even calling manufacturers to ask them, “Does switching to bagel actually do something or should I toast my bagel in a pan like the British do?”

Dad then goes to every Walmart and Target in the tri-state area looking for the right model. He finds Janeane Garofalo working as a greeter at a Walmart in Camden, makes a hand gesture in her direction that only an Italian would truly understand, and drives off. He finally decides to buy the toaster via the Walmart website, his very first online transaction. Before entering his credit card number he’s on the phone with Walmart’s online customer service for three hours asking if some hooligan is going to make off with his credit card and donate money to the Kerry campaign. He is assured that online transactions are safer than making toast.

He buys the toaster but in order to save money on shipping he has it carried by hobos hitching rides on trains across America. Given that very few hobos ride trains anymore, I expect he’ll have the toaster just in time for my visit at Christmas. He’ll spend seven weeks studying the users manual and repeatedly tell my mom, “We have to move the kitchen – if this thing is plugged in too close to the bathroom it might fall in the tub.” The tub they use is upstairs and in a different area code.

That’s how I expect the new toaster purchase to go, if they even get through phase one. I could have built a new toaster with things lying about the house in the time it’s taken me to type this. I’d better go and toast my bagel in a pan or with some nuclear weapons.

Published
Categorized as Amusements

The Woodstock for religious orders

The Woodstock for religious orders was held in Fort Worth last weekend. Dom has his usual insightful insights which are linked above. I urge you to read his commentary on this story in the Dallas Morning News – “Among faithful, mum isn’t the word.”

The irony of the title is plain. Faithful who? The unfaithfully faithful? The religious who openly defy the bugaboo of modernity, the Vatican?

“Security in our church has come to be identified with the controlling power of the clergy to the detriment of the people in the pews,” said the Rev. Michael Crosby, a priest from Milwaukee. “We are perishing numerically because we have not been public enough in our protest of patriarchy.”

The security Fr. Crosby mentions was of the false kind. Some Bishops thought they could sweep the problems of sexual abuse under the proverbial rug. We know what the result is. Fr. Crosby speaks, though, as one who would give more power to the laity. But power to do what? Elect a pastor? Force a priest out they don’t like? There are many who like to make the Church into a democracy and they would make the immutable truths of faith and morals as flighty as the age.

Fr. Crosby’s subsequent statement about the cause of the lack of vocations is incorrect. He says they haven’t been public enough in their protest of the patriarchy. I say many orders are dying on the vine because they have rejected their patrimony, traditions, and the patriarchy of the Church. The orders that embrace them are flourishing, such as the Nashville Dominicans and the CFR’s. The Legionaries of Christ and Opus Dei are other examples of groups that are truly faithful to the Church and thriving. I was considering entering the Legionaries, actually, but my hair is parted on the wrong side and I’m no good at soccer. But never you mind that – what I’m saying is Fr. Crosby and his confreres don’t see the writing on the wall.

Take the traditional habit, for example. It’s a symbol, it’s not just a garment. A symbol always leads one to the substantial meaning it symbolizes. That’s why it’s called a symbol. Religious habits are made in the form of a cross. The religious who wears a habit is truly taking up the Cross, putting it on, making the Cross central to their interior and exterior life.

The Claretian martyrs of Barbastro would disagree with the “progressive” religious of today. The Spanish Marxists killed some fifty Claretian seminarians in 1936 because they were faithful Catholics in formation for the priesthood and because they wore the cassock. Their lives would be spared, they were told, if they took off the cassock. The Claretians, truly faithful to the substance behind the symbol, refused and went to their death.