Some more bad news for the Legion of Christ, shortly after Juan Vaca (one of Maciel’s first victims to come forward publicly) reportedly dismisses recent LC/RC apologies as vague and mere media strategy (click here).
In a live Spanish-language radio interview earlier today, Jose Raul Gonzalez (one of Maciel’s alleged sons) accuses the Legion of Christ/ Regnum Christi founder of having sexually abused Raul and his brother. According to notes taken by Aaron during the interview, Raul also alleges that although Fr. Carlos Skertchly (the priest who met with Raul on behalf of current LC Director General Fr. Alvaro Corcuera) “talks about Christian charity,” Fr. Skertchly “rejects Raul’s requests for money as his inheritance and also in compensation for 8 YEARS OF SEXUAL ABUSE OF RAUL AND HIS BROTHER BY MACIEL.” You can read Aaron’s summary translation here and here.
Additionally, CNN Mexico has posted its report (in Spanish) here. Additionally, Youtube has uploaded part of the radio interview (Starts about 90 seconds into the first part):
Part 1
Part 2
Author: Pete Vere
Legionaries needed to protect us from homosexual Jesuits?
No comment.
UPDATE: Giselle tackles the queer Jesuit theory here.
UPDATE II: Thanks to loyal reader Jane for uncovering the original article to which the above op-ed was responding. Although I still disagree with the author’s slag against the Jesuits (let me know when the LC produces a Fr. John Hardon, SJ) , I’m a little more sympathetic knowing the original piece was published in February of ’09 (when the scandal first broke) rather than February of ’10. Why a response was published over a year later, I don’t know.
The cow that stole the monk
ExLC’s reposting of The Monk, the Cow and the Apology has garnered quite the reader reaction. An anonymous reader weighs in this morning with the following:
Consider the following possible interpretation of Monk’s version of the story: the monk who pushed the cow off the cliff is the Pope who will more than likely shut down the LC/RC (the cow). The fruit from the RC/LC members efforts to build up the Church while clinging to LC/RC are like the lot of the poor family that clung to the cow(LC/RC) for their lifeline. When our Holy Father “pushes their cow over the cliff” they will be forced to cling to Christ and he will then be able to use their efforts in a purer and more fruitful way. From Monk’s version: ” “You know Father, we used to have a cow. She kept us alive. We didn’t own anything else. One day she fell down the cliff and died. To survive, we had to start doing other things, develop skills we did not even know we had. We were forced to come up with new ways of doing things. It was the best thing that ever happened to us! We are now much better off than before.” I have experienced this in my own life. It is so much brighter outside of the movement. God has great plans for you, LC/RC members, that will be realized once you let go of the “cow” and let Christ, not the LC priests, be your hope!! I look forward to your release!!!
That’s not a bad way of looking at it. However, it requires a little tweaking of the original story, to explain why it became morally acceptable to take the cow and push it off the cliff. Otherwise we’re back to the utilitarian error of “the ends justify the means.” One of the first principles of Catholic moral theology is the following: “One cannot do evil so that good may come about.”
So let’s try this again, but from the other perspective:
***************
The cow that stole the monk
A long time ago, an Abbott set out on his travels accompanied by his assistant, a Brother, and a cow. Night was falling when the Abbott told the Brother to go on ahead to find lodging. The Brother found a humble trailer, in the middle of nowhere, which he ignored. The family was obviously poor since they lived in a trailer. And from the statue of St. Peter Claver standing beside the doorsteps, the Brother discerned that the family was probably of darker complexion.
This was hardly suitable lodging for the Abbott, who suffered from a rare allergy to eumelanin – the pigmentation that causes darker skin tones in humans. In fact, the Pope had secretly dispensed the Abbott from ministering to Catholics with dark complexions. Now the Brother had never actually spoken to the Pope or read the letter of dispensation (after all, it was so secret it could only be passed on through the confessional!), the Abbott had assured the Brother that this was the case. Of course, an exception was made for Catholics of African ancestry who possessed a lot of gold (since the metal’s bright glistening reflected sufficient light from other sources to neutralize the darkness of their skin tone) or those who wore special red hats given to them personally by the Pope.
However, the Brother noticed a heard of cows nearby, which meant the family were probably migrant farm hands working a nearby dairy farm. So the Brother continued up the road until he notices a large, stately, country manor.
The mother, father and children were dressed in the latest styles usually found only among the big city bourgeoisie. It was pure fashion! And the Abbott, having received a vision of clerical fashions in the 1950’s, required his Brothers to conform to his vision, despite the fact the 1950’s were still several centuries away. Some would call this the Abbott’s charism.
So the Brother asked if he and the Abbott could spend the night in their dwelling. “You are most welcome to spend the night,” said the father of the family. They prepared a feast of expensive hams, fine cigars, and brought in some Mariachi minstrels for entertainment. The Abbott’s cow was put out in the pasture with the other cows.
The next morning, the Brother and the Abbott said their good-byes and set out to continue their journey. They had an important meeting in Rome and far was their journey. They were even a little behind schedule as it would be several centuries before the invention of airplanes.
“Could we borrow a horse and carriage from you?” said the Abbott.
“Sure,” said the Mother. She trusted the Abbott and Brother were holy men of God who would remember her in prayer once they got to Rome, despite the Abbott having been too tired to preside over grace during the visit.
“That’s very charitable of you,” said the Abbott. “But what about our cow? She could hardly keep up with this horse and carriage. And I have important business with the Pope.”
“We could keep her here with the other cows,” said the Mother. “I’m sure my husband doesn’t mind.”
“That’s been your vocation since before eternity,” said the Abbott. “I knew you would not say no to God. So understand that my cow requires extra care. She has been personally blessed by the Pope. So she is a sacred cow, who due to delicate health has required golden treatment since a young calf. You must massage her three times a day, feed her only the best grains and at specific times, and milk her gently in the morning and in the evening. She requires her stall cleaned daily, and fresh straw to sleep on. Here’s the checklist. Plus, because it would be sinful to waste her milk, you must promise me you will feed only her milk to your family. This may sound like a lot, but I know you won’t say no to God.”
The woman promised and the Abbott headed off in the coach with the Brother. Years later, a Bishop ordained the Brother a priest. So he too became a Monk. One day he found himself on the same road where he found lodging so many years ago. Remembering the comfortable digs and the special treatment, he decided to visit the family. He rounded the curve in the road and to his surprise, he saw the mansion reduced to rubble, surrounded by gardens that had been taken over by weeds. In the middle of the field, flies buzzed around the rotting carcasses of an entire herd of cows.
The Monk knocked on the door. A poorly-dressed man answered. The Monk asked, “What ever became of the family who used to live here? Did they sell the property to you?”
The man looked surprised and said he and his family had always lived on the property. The Monk told him how he had stayed in a nice mansion on the same spot, with his master the old Abbott. “What happened to the family that lived here?” he asked.
The man pointed a pike at the Monk’s throat. “You know Father, we used to have a herd of cows. They kept us alive. Quite comfortably, I might add. But then my wife invited your cow into our field, as an act of charity toward you and the Church. Your cow required a lot of care – my wife started spending all her time in the barn, to the neglect of our children, me and the household. The effort burned her out. I tried to reason with her, but you had her convinced the cow was sacred and that God would punish her if she did not put your sacred cow before everything else.”
“Moreover, our kids – who had always been of strong constitution – fell ill most of the time, and could no longer help out around the farm. Either they were helping Mom keep up with your checklist, or they were suffering from the effects of their sickness. At first I thought the sickness was due to them and their Mother spending too much time in the barn, stressing out over your cow. I called the doctor. He informed me that my wife and children had Mad Cow disease, which we traced back to your cow. But by then it had spread to my herd. Our family is ruined is because of the charity you extracted from us!”
“How dare you say such uncharitable things,” said the Monk. “That cow was blessed by the Pope!”
“Well this morning my farm hand Cyrene Porres came over to the farm, roped your cow, and at my instructions pushed it over the cliff,” said the father. “Although it is too late for my family and herd, your golden cow will not be infecting any more families or herds.”
And with that the Monk rushed over the cliff attempting to save his sacred cow.
The Monk who laughed at himself
Something that always concerned me about Legionary priests I encountered is how serious they came across when socializing with other Catholics. I never saw them laugh at themselves or their order. In fact, they would become quite serious and defensive if you joked about their similar haircuts or about certain practices associated with the order.
In contrast, I’ve been blessed with the opportunity to meet and socialize with superiors and founders of many other new movements – FSSP, Companions of the Cross, Madonna House, Opus Dei, Franciscans of the Renewal, HLI, Oratorians, Le Barroux (traditionalist) monastery – and high-profile orthodox members of older congregations and movements (Dominicans, Trappists, Studites, Knights of Columbus, Order of Alhambra) not to mention Fr. Mitch Pacwa and other orthodox Jesuits. They ALL had a sense of humor about themselves and their movement. I forget whether it was St. Josemaria Escriva or Ven. Catherine de Huek (or possibly both) who referred to themselves often as “God’s donkey,” discussing how their personal foibles and mistakes always got in the way of the work the Holy Spirit had founded through them.
And then there is Fr. Bob Bedard, founder of the Companions of the Cross (Canada’s fastest growing clerical institute of consecrated life) who so vigorously opposed to God’s call to found a new order that he tried to enlist his Archbishop in his resistance effort. Much to Fr. Bedard’s shock, his Archbishop sided with God. Only then did Fr. Bedard accept that he needed to get out of the way and allow the Holy Spirit to impart a new charism.
These are far from the sorrowful saints St. Therese warned us about.
Which is why I think we have to give Monk credit for laughing at himself. Which is what I assume is his intention in re-writing my re-write of his parable. You can read his re-write here.
We’re all aware of how ugly the situation is with the LC, especially as more victims surface with the truth. I know Monk sometimes presents himself in a manner that makes the rest of us cringe, and one is right to call him on it. But his ability to laugh at himself is a positive sign in my estimation. I would give him a good blast if I felt he was laughing at the victims or laughing in a way dismissive of the serious allegations against his former order and Maciel. But I don’t feel this is the case here. I think he recognizes the problems with Maciel and I sense he is becoming more aware of the anger and disappointment many feel towards the current LC/RC leadership.
One thing to keep in mind – something I’ve come to recognize after spending the last 10 years working with former LC and RC who were victims of Maciel – is that clergy and laity are ontologically different. A priest does not stop being a priest ontologically just because he’s been dispensed from the clerical state or stopped practicing his priesthood. So former LC clergy will, in my experience, process things differently than former RC, who are mainly laity. This is why, among former ReGAIN folk behind the scenes, I’m occasionally called to mediate between former LC and former RC.
What follows has been my experience: Former LC tend to look at Maciel’s actions and those who covered up for him in terms of abuse of the priesthood and religious life. On the other hand, former RC (with the exception of former 3gf) tend to look at the controversy in terms of betrayal of their family and how children and young people were victimized. Finally, former 3gf look at the issue in terms of betrayal of their enthusiasm for the Catholic faith.
So for some coming from Monk’s perspective – that is as a priest who had given up everything for the Legion – the monk who stole the cow analogy makes sense. Monk had everything taken from him, and then managed to survive and overcome the hardship. However, from the perspective of former RC, those who now see themselves as having sacrificed their families and their children’s well-being to perpetuate a pious fraud, I cannot think of a more horrific analogy. Hence the visceral reaction to Monk and his story among many lay commentators formerly associated with Maciel and his movement.
Regardless, all of us are called to pray for and demand justice for the victims. Yet in making sense of what happened, we cannot allow Maciel and the LC to deprive us of the ability to laugh at ourselves. There is already too much tragedy in terms of how people felt compelled to suppress human emotions “for the sake of the Kingdom”. To laugh at oneself amidst this tragedy is to re-awaken one’s humanity.
That being said, a reader has sent me this video of Fr. Alvaro and the latest lay reaction he encountered in his continuing quest for the Holy Charism:
Mrs Bible Buck – Rest in Peace
Please pray for my buddy Charlie (aka “Bible Buck” on comboxes and CB) and for the repose of his wife’s soul. She passed away earlier this week. The couple had been married 44 years, never fell out of love, and her death came as a surprise. Of course Charlie’s feeling it hard. Today is the funeral.
Some of our older readers may remember Bible Buck as an early pioneer of the contemporary Catholic apologetics movement. He was a long-distance truck driver with a grade 8 education who evangelized and defended Catholic teaching using the Bible wherever he trucked. He is also reputed to have memorized every verse of the Bible. In fact, a favorite game whenever we traveled together was for me to name a Bible verse and then listen to him recite it from memory.
His wife was a kind woman who acted as surrogate mother to Sonya and me during our first year-and-a-half in the U.S. (Before we moved to Florida) She invited us over for dinner every Christmas and Thanksgiving, was the first to visit us in the hospital after Sonya had given birth to our oldest, and did us many other favors our own moms couldn’t do from another country and a thousand miles away.
Although she and her husband were very much in love and very devout in their Catholic faith, she preferred to keep a low profile, helping people behind the scenes. So out of respect for her privacy, the family has asked that I simply name her “Mrs. Bible Buck” when requesting prayers from readers – the name by which she was known when supporting her husband’s apologetics and evangelization apostolate.