Bush, Chirac and the Holy

Bush, Chirac and the Holy Father — Reading From the Same Page

I’m sure if I did a google search, I could call up a number of hate crimes perpetrated against Arabs and Muslims (and in some case Hindus) in the United States after 9-11. However, I won’t. Rising to the occasion after this tragedy, I recall President Bush stating: “Hate and racism are not American values. Those who perpetuate these crimes will be punished, for their behavior is as wrong as it is un-American.” (As I’m recalling from memory, this may not be word-for-word what he said, but I imagine it is close.) President Bush is normally not a very passionate speaker. He is, however, a man of deep conviction. What struck me about this line is that his conviction came through with passion. So I take the President’s word at face value when he states that true Americans are neither anti-Arab nor anti-Muslim. Certainly his father, the 41st President of the United States, recently spoke very fondly of his friendship with many Arab leaders. So while the problem was serious enough among a certain segment of the American population to warrant the President’s attention, he rose to the occasion and spoke firmly, clearly and decisively on behalf of all Americans. There is no room for racial and religious hatred within American political discourse.

That being said, a certain minority segment of the French population suffer from a similar problem when it comes to the Jews. Hence the reason Jean-Marie Le Pen made it to the run-off in France’s last presidential election. That being said, and being fluent in French I followed the election closely, he was soundly defeated by Jacques Chirac who brought in close to eighty percent of the vote. Not only did Chirac soundly condemn Le Pen’s antisemitism if I recall correctly, he paid Le Pen the ultimate French insult in refusing to debate him on television. Of course you never hear of this from those who are currently attribute the French anti-war sentiment to anti-semitism, just as you seldom hear about President Bush’s statements by those who portray the war as an American crusade against Islam.

As a Catholic ecumenist, however, I stand with the Holy Father on the issue. When it comes to religious dialogue with non-Christian faiths, there is a special place for Judaism and Islam, with whom we share the same God and a common historical link. Hence the reason the Holy Father has repeatedly called for peace, dialogue and a renounciation of violence from both sides in the Middle East conflict. While previous Roman Pontiffs favored the Muslims over the Jews during one pontificate, and then the Jews over the Muslims during the next, in his wisdom our current Holy Father has rejected realpolitik for the Gospel of Jesus Christ, loving both equally as children of God.

There is definitely wisdom to the Holy Father’s approach. As a young Pole who resisted the Nazis, he remembers the Jewish Holocaust all too well. He remembers how people woke up after the war in shock. How could seemingly “minor” and “harmless” acts of anti-semitism before the war suddenly escalate into one of the tragic death of six million people? Only in retrospect do we now realize that our actions toward the Jews before the war were neither minor nor harmless. Fortunately, we are now more sensitive to these issues when it comes to our Jewish brethren, for this is one tragedy we do not wish to repeat. Given many of our current frustrations, however, we must also show the same vigilance when it comes to Islam — lest we wake up one morning and ask ourselves how we ever allowed six million Muslims to go to their premature and tragic mass grave in our backyard, or in someone else’s.

Another (Arch)Bishop Weighs In —

Another (Arch)Bishop Weighs In — Insufficient Justification for War

While I don’t always agree with him, I think he’s right when it comes to this issue. Anway, here’s Archbishop Flynn’s take on the war, and why it does not appear to meet the standards of Just War theory. Click Here

Pray for our Chaldean brethrenWhile

Pray for our Chaldean brethren

While pursuing my licentiate in canon law at Saint Paul University, I was blessed with the wonderful opportunity to study at and participate in activities at the Metropolitain Sheptytsky Institute of Eastern Christian Studies. There I met and came to an appreciation of the Tradition of a number of our Eastern Christian brethren, both Catholic and Orthodox. So it is with a certain sadness of heart that I read the following piece: Iraq Christians Fearful Of Backlash.

Particularly heart-wrenching is the following paragraph: “Who can predict what will happen if the genie gets out of the bottle?” Father Youssef Tuma told Reuters. “Prayers are all we have left. In the event of an aggression by the West, we pray the other party does not take it out on us or look at Christians of the East as the cause,” he said. Christian leaders in Iraq, an officially secular country which has tolerated a variety of religious groups, said they have seen an increase in anti-Christian sentiment, mainly from Sunni Wahhabis, followers of a very strict form of Islam popular in Saudi Arabia.

Like the Holy Father, my heart and prayers go out to our Chaldean brothers and sisters in Christ. Regardless of the outcome, we need to pray for our Chaldean brethren in Iraq as well as all our Christian brethren in the Middle-East.

Did I pray enough?As war

Did I pray enough?

As war will likely begin soon, I’m stuck asking myself whether or not I prayed enough alongside the Holy Father for a peaceful solution. Although I’m ashamed to say it, the answer is probably no. Nevertheless, I continue to take heart in the following words of St. Josemaria Escriva: “There are many of us; with the help of God, we can reach everywhere…”

Alone Among the Pro-Peace CrowdFalling

Alone Among the Pro-Peace Crowd

Falling on the pro-peace side of the current debate, things can be a little lonely at times given that overall, I think George W. Bush is a good President. (I’m particularly happy about his support for a ban on partial-birth abortion.) That being said, I will continue to stand with the Holy Father on the issue of the potential war with Iraq. I don’t think we’ve exhausted all peacefull options when it comes to disarming Iraq, and I think we also need the support the United Nations (or given the current French threat to use a veto, at least the moral victory that would come from a clear majority within the Security Council).

Nevertheless, over the last couple of weeks I have seen some silly arguments and ploys arise on both sides of the debate. Since you’re already familiar with those on the pro-peace side, allow me to address a couple on the pro-war side. The first is the attempted change in name from “French Fries” and “French Toast” to “Freedom Fries” and “Freedom Toast”. Besides the fact that French Fries actually come from Belgium, I just don’t see what this accomplishes. If we are to be consistent here, should we also not change the name of one of our favorite saints in America to “St. Freedom of Assisi”? After all, his father chose the name “Francis” in honor of the French.

Secondly, some are suggesting that the Holy Father considers this potential war moral because he has not excommunicated or threatened with excommunication those who partake in the war. The argument goes that if the Church considered the actions of the US and the UK to be immoral, the Church would be obliged to excommunicate all those who partake in it. This shows a poor grasp of the canonical concept of excommunication, which should only be used in the rarest of circumstances. This is why, in the last Century or two, while addressing the political leaders, Rome has seldom excommunicated the troops in the field. Very often, these folks just get dragged into things.

That being said, there are two obvious answers to the Pope-hasn’t-excommunicated-the-coalition-of-the-willing argument. First, there are a number of Chaldean Catholics in Saddam’s army, who will likely be fighting for Saddam. The Chaldean Catholic Church is in full communion with Rome. Given that the Holy Father has not excommunicated or threatened to excommunicate those Chaldean Catholics among Saddam’s ranks, does this mean that the Church also supports Iraq’s actions as just? Secondly, Cardinal Ratzinger, despite his strong personal distaste for Hitler and the Nazi regime, served in the German Army during World War II. I don’t recall ever coming across anything that suggests that young Josef Ratzinger was excommunicated during this time. Therefore, does this mean that recent criticism of the Church’s handling of World War II are correct and Pope Pius XII really did side with the Nazis? If not, then why didn’t he excommunicate those young German Catholics like Ratzinger who fought on Germany’s side?