Dean out of his bean

He is so unserious and self-contradictory that I can barely muster any strong feelings toward him, but attention must be paid to Howard Dean. At least for the moment, until he has an aneurysm from being so darn angry all the time.
The article says Dean is “focusing his criticism squarely on Bush, whom he said was dividing Americans by race, class, religion and sexual orientation.” How’s this for inclusive rhetoric:

“This democracy and the flag of the United States do not belong to Rush Limbaugh, and Jerry Falwell, and Tom DeLay, and John Ashcroft, and Dick Cheney,” Dean said as he listed prominent conservatives. “This flag and this country belong to us and we want our country back.”

Did he mean the flag doesn’t only belong to Rush et al.? Because surely the flag is just as much the property of Jerry Fallwell as it is Howard Dean or any of his sandaled followers.
Dean doesn’t think fundamentalist Christians are Americans, either:

I want my country back. We want our country back. I am tired of being divided. I don’t want to listen to the fundamentalist preachers anymore. I want America to look like America. Where we are all included, hand in hand, walking down. We have dream. We can only reach the dream if we are all together – black and white, gay and straight, man and woman.

…unless you’re one of those creepy snake-handling Christians, in which case you can go to hell.
Speaking of creepy, here is Nietzsche’s Superman advocating bad policy in the same speech:

We have made Medicaid into a middle class entitlement. If you made $52,000 a year or less in Vermont everybody under 18 in your family is entitled to Medicaid…if you are at the upper-end of that, we charge $50 a month…Now, if we can do that in a small rural state which is 26th in income in the entire country, surely the most wealthy and powerful society on the face of the earth can grant all of its citizens healthcare. I am a governor and I am a doctor and I have done it.

How magnanimous! His Excellency Governor Dean, ruling a population the size of Milwaukee, “granted” his subjects “free” healthcare. As Pete Vere said in a previous post, free healthcare ain’t free, and Dean didn’t mention that Vermont has the highest per-capita tax burden of any U.S. state.

In Vermont we have conserved hundreds of thousands of acres that will never be developed, and I might add Mr. President, they’re never going to be drilled on either.

Has there been a recent stampede to exploit the vast oil deposits of Vermont? One that was manfully resisted by Governor Dean?
For sheer head-scratching nuttiness, my favorite quotation is from two weeks ago, from a speech at the University of Maryland

“Let’s talk about that middle class tax cut,” Dean said. “Tell me how much your tuition went up last year. Tell them how much your parents’ property taxes went up. That was money taken from the middle class and given to Ken Lay and the boys who ran Enron.”

I don’t know how they do things across the river in Maryland, but our property taxes went up because our house is worth a lot more than it was last year. The Johnsons consider that a good thing.
Literally, this is what he’s saying:
1. Last year, the Republicans figured out how to siphon off tuition money paid to the University of Maryland, and tax money sent to the Treasurer of Maryland, and stick it in a Federal account.
2. The Republicans then ordered the U.S. Treasury to write one of those yellow Statue of Liberty checks, payable to “KENNETH LAY AND THE BOYS AT ENRON.”
3. This was accomplished through a middle-class tax cut that did not take effect until more than a year after Enron declared bankruptcy, and “Ken Lay and the boys” were out on their ears.
Like lots of people who are more knowledgeable than me, I don’t think Howard Dean will be president, and I don’t know that he’ll even get the Democratic nomination. Then again, I always thought everyone must surely see right through Bill Clinton, and he wouldn’t stand a chance.
[Quotations were edited for spelling and grammar.]

Published
Categorized as Politics

Addictions and moral culpability

I’m moving this dispute out of the comment box because it’s not germane to the original topic. In my post on the aggressively eccentric Martin Sheen, I said “the ‘root cause’ of most poverty is bad morals: infidelity leading to divorce, illegitimacy, drug and alcohol addictions, etc.”
Gordon Zaft strongly disagreed with my characterization of addictions, calling me a “fool.” (Join the club! “Gordon Zaft” might be a pseudonym for one of my former teachers, or perhaps an ex-girlfriend.) Gordon elaborates in a subsequent comment:

Drug and alcohol addictions are most certainly NOT merely “bad morals” and it is, pardon me for saying so, unChristian to suggest that it is. It also does not square with a great deal of real research which shows real causes for addictive personalities. To deny them is, in fact, foolish.

If by “real” you mean that certain people are genetically predisposed to addictions, then you’re right. The idea that certain weaknesses can be passed along to children is an insight that predates modern medicine by more than 2,000 years. Further, it wouldn’t surprise me if the same studies confirmed that the level of predisposition varies from individual to individual.
The Catechism leaves no room for doubt that abusing drugs or alcohol is intrinsically sinful:

2290 The virtue of temperance disposes us to avoid every kind of excess: the abuse of food, alcohol, tobacco, or medicine….
2291 The use of drugs inflicts very grave damage on human health and life. Their use, except on strictly therapeutic grounds, is a grave offense….
[see quotation in context]

So there is a physical, genetic component to addictions, and a moral component. In some individuals, the physical component can be overwhelming, and the moral component minimal. In others, the opposite can be true. As addictions progress, the addict’s will tends to become weaker and weaker, until the choice to take another drink or reach for the syringe is barely a choice at all.
I’m not a moral theologian. I don’t even play one on the Web. But I can’t really see how “bad morals” is an incorrect way to describe drug and alcohol abuse. I am not saying that addiction is exclusively a moral matter in every case, but unless someone is clinically insane and not responsible for his actions, then the addict must confront his own sinfulness and repent. It doesn’t do him any good to explain away the addiction as merely genetic.
Gordon, maybe you could elaborate a little more about your objection. Perhaps I’m not understanding your point. Anyone else who wants to throw in their two cents (or if you’re from Canada, two pesetas), please do so.

Published
Categorized as Ethics

Schismatic singers

Admitting the obvious, the Dixie Chicks say they aren’t country musicians anymore. Good — maybe the local country station will stop playing their music. They’re one of the major reasons I don’t tune in anymore, because I’m tired of hearing their pseudo-country stylings, especially “Goodbye Earl,” a disturbing tale of first-degree murder. The theme: pre-meditated killing is fine, as long as your husband is a brutal jerk. If I wanted amoral music, there are plenty of other options out there.
Maybe they can have an official excommunication ceremony in Nashville, the Country Music Vatican. Instead of bell, book, and candle, they could have a steel guitar, a Hank Williams Sr. songbook, and a headlight from an old Ford F-150 pickup.
So be it.

Martin Sheen to Canada: you complete me

Pete, you’re wrong to talk bad about Canada’s moral condition. Loudmouth Catholic public person Martin Sheen says it’s in great shape. I’ll quote this in its entirety, because it will doubtless disappear from Drudge soon:

American actor and activist Martin Sheen had kind words for Canada when he received an award for being a Christian role model, the CANADIAN PRESS reports.
“Every time I cross this border I feel like I’ve left the land of lunatics,” Sheen said Saturday, adding he was “proud” of Canada for not entering the Iraq war.
“You are not armed and dangerous. You do not shoot each other. I always feel a bit more human when I come here.”
Sheen, who has been outspoken recently in his opposition the U.S.-led war in Iraq, was in Windsor to receive the Christian Culture Gold Medal from Assumption University.
The university will offer a new scholarship in his name.

I have a plea for Mr. Sheen, if he’s still up north: Stay there, Christian role model! Stay there and be more human! Come back and visit sometimes, but by all means, if you’re beset by all the insanity of living in the USA, and you’ve found a better place, it’s time to move. Maybe Martin and Pete can trade citizenship? Let’s find a lawyer to arrange it.
I’d have a lot more tolerance for the man if he talked about the injustice of abortion instead of his boutique moral concerns like the School of the Americas, or running interference for Marxist thugs like the Sandinistas. He prattles on and on about the poor, but in this country at least, the “root cause” of most poverty is bad morals: infidelity leading to divorce, illegitimacy, drug and alcohol addictions, etc.
Similarly, it’s fine that he’s a pacifist, and I admire his willingness to get arrested for his beliefs (over 200 times!), but Sheen never seems to suffer any real consequences. Does getting arrested that way really help change people’s minds? People would be impressed if he risked 5-to-10 in the Federal slammer for sabotaging a nuclear weapons lab, but if all he has to do is pay a fine, he can’t expect anyone to take him too seriously.
The more I hear him, the more I realize that the drugged-up schizoid character he played in “Apocalypse Now” wasn’t much of a stretch for him as an actor.
Sheen will probably decline voluntary exile, and return to the shootin’ gallery that is America. After all, he has to pick up his “West Wing” paychecks on this side of the border.