Given the title, I’m forced to wonder if Maureen Dowd is really necessary…
1 comment
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Given the title, I’m forced to wonder if Maureen Dowd is really necessary…
You must be logged in to post a comment.
MoDo isn’t necessary at all — she was just a replacement for Anna Quindlen. The NYT needed a pro-abortion pseudo-Catholic woman, and she fit the quota.
That article you linked to was nauseating. Maybe years ago she was original, but now Dowd is just like the Times’ other columnists: reflexively liberal, loose with the facts, and stylistically ho-hum.