Category: Controversies

Sympathy for the devil’s servant

Which is more contrary to human dignity, this…

…or this:

?
Cardinal Renato Martino, the reflexively anti-war prelate who predicted a gigantic disaster if Iraq’s government was replaced by force, gets a little sad about poor Saddam:

“I felt pity to see this man destroyed, (the military) looking at his teeth as if he were a cow. They could have spared us these pictures,” he said.
“Seeing him like this, a man in his tragedy, despite all the heavy blame he bears, I had a sense of compassion for him,” he said in answer to questions about Saddam’s arrest.

Medical exams upon capture are perfectly legal and routine. Releasing a videotape of a prisoner is also legal, and proving that he was in custody serves a military purpose.

“It’s true that we should be happy that this (arrest) has come about because it is the watershed that was necessary… we hope that this will not have worse and other serious consequences,” Martino said….”But is seems to me to be illusory to hope that this will repair the dramas and the damage of the defeat for humanity that a war always brings about.”

Why was it “necessary” to capture Saddam if the war itself was unnecessary? And if it’s the result of a “defeat for humanity,” then…what…huh…not quite understanding…brain overloading….
Joseph Lieberman said that if it were up to Howard Dean, Saddam would still be in power, killing Iraqis and threatening his neighbors. The same thing can be said — and I say this with a heavy heart — about many bishops.
Unlike the Holy Father, the good cardinal has been content to repeat the European line about war being obsolete without any nuance or reservation, and does not even bother to root his comments in the Gospel. You know who I feel compassion for? The Iraqis who lost their loved ones because of this man. I feel pity for Saddam because of the fate that awaits him if he remains unrepentant. But compassion? I’ll reserve that for the mothers whose sons were dragged off and murdered, or used as cannon fodder in useless wars.

Yes, Fatima will remain Catholic

An article circulating among traditionalists charges that the sanctuary at Fatima is “to become an interfaith shrine”, according to statements at a recent conference:

Delegates attending the Vatican and United Nations (UN) inspired annual interfaith congress “The Future of God”, held during October in Fátima, heard how the Shrine is to be developed into a centre where all the religions of the world will gather to pay homage to their various gods. The Congress was held in the Paul VI Pastoral Centre and presided over by the Cardinal Patriarch of Lisbon José de Cruz Policarpo.

The discerning reader will recognize right away that this is agitprop, a story perhaps with some basis, but spun to the max, in this case by people who have an interest in making the Vatican look as if it were betraying the faith. The Lefebvrites organized a protest at the site; the Grunerite press‘s representative is appalled that an interfaith conference would be held at Fatima; and the whole thing is sounding through the echo chamber of the rad-trad network.
It looks like the conference was indeed an opportunity for indifferentist talk by some participants, Catholic and otherwise, but fortunately, somebody has thought to ask the Vatican representative Abp. Fitzgerald about the rumors, and he confirms that while Fatima welcomes all people to come, talk of “an interfaith shrine” is 100% bunk.
A retired American guy named Rick Salbato lives in Fatima, putting together his web site about Catholic controversies; he’s provided his own take on the affair too.

Crusaders

The Boston Globe’s look at the vast right-wing conspiracy within the AmChurch
(link from Amy)
Two years after Kennedy’s election, Pope John XXIII called the Second Vatican Council. Vatican II is now a towering historical event, representing for some the ongoing spirit of reform in the church and for others a kind of theological breeder reactor, constantly on the edge of going out of control. While favoring the latter view, Pope John Paul II, who has led the Catholic Church since 1978, also has reinterpreted the events of the council in such a way that they support his traditionalist view of the church.
Over his lengthy pontificate, John Paul II has allied himself with the traditionalist side of every ongoing dispute within the church.
It strikes me that the media is unable to grasp what is that core of Catholicism – absolute and certain Truth that is unchanging. So when JP II preaches about the Truth, we’re told he’s supporting his “traditionalist” view of the Church. And because he’s a “traditionalist” he put the kabosh on the Vatican II reforms, as though the council stopped just short of allowing women to be ordained and it just needed a little push to make sure we can pack our entire wish-list of western sociological hang-ups into how the Church teaches and preaches.
When the children of the 60’s wax poetic about Vatican II, they get all glassy eyed and dreamy. When “traditionalists” remind them of the substance of Vatican II in the form of the actual documents they clamp their hands over their ears and run screaming into night.
Am I wrong about this?
And here’s another nugget of wisdom from one of the brightest stars of Catholic acaedmia:
“But what will they do,” wonders Notre Dame’s [Rev.] Richard McBrien, contemplating the post-John Paul II church, “without their great patron?”
You know what we’ll do? We’ll have another Pope who by the grace of God preaches and teaches Truth in a holy and uncomprising fashion. Is your brain too full of postmodern theology that you don’t remember the Gospel of Matthew and 2000 years of Catholicism?
It quite sad that you often manage to reinforce the media’s mistaken idea that the Church is just a big club and if you get “your man” in power everything will change over night.
So to Richard McBrien: how about praying a Rosary before answering your phone next time? That may prevent the floor in Hell being paved with the skulls of priests. And I’ll do the same because God knows I need the prayers.