Is Islam a religion of peace? Nope. Just ask Cardinal Pells of Australia. And the Koran.
“In my own reading of the Koran, I began to note down invocations to violence,” he said. “There are so many of them, however, that I abandoned this exercise after 50 or 60 or 70 pages.”
He discussed the perceived differences between parts of the Koran written during Mohammed’s years in Mecca – when his position was weak and he was still hoping to win converts, including Christians and Jews – and those written during his subsequent years in Medina, when “the spread of Islam through conquest and coercion began.”
[The differences in the text from those two periods hold apparent contradictions between, for example, the concept of “jihad,” meaning striving or waging war. Some verses counsel a patient response to mockery from unbelievers; others incite warfare against them. The question of whether the Medina chapters (suras) replaced and revoked the Mecca ones have long exercised scholars.]
“The predominant grammatical form in which jihad is used in the Koran carries the sense of fighting or waging war,” Pell said.
It was legitimate to ask “our Islamic partners in dialogue” for their views on these matters.
“Do they believe that the peaceful suras of the Koran are abrogated by the verses of the sword?” he asked. …more.
A very valuable question to ask.
He did make some comments about environmentalism that probably needed more explanation. Think about this coming from the USCCB – would that make you laugh, or cry?
In a section of the speech dealing with what he called the “emptiness” of secularism, he said “some of the hysteric and extreme claims about global warming are also a symptom of pagan emptiness, of Western fear when confronted by the immense and basically uncontrollable forces of nature.”