A letter to the Editor of the Washington Times form Laurie Letourneau, President, Life Action League of Massachusetts and Mass Voices for Traditional Marriage. You have to scroll down the page a bit.
Don’t miss the the other letters on the Federal Marriage Amendment. A pro-homosexual marriage advocate says Bush’s job “is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, not to change it and abuse it.” A premise he in no way substantiates or justifies.
Another reader says the defeat of the amendment is a victory for states’ rights. I think Eric mentioned there is litigation pending to recognize Massachusetts same-sex marriages in other states. Of course I could be mistaken. Regardless, the question of homosexual marriage is on an inexorable course for the federal judiciary system if it is not there already. What is left up the states now anyway? I think states’ rights ended with the War of Northern Aggression.
This is so hysterical…to see a bunch of commie leftist Senators the other day shrieking to the cameras that this is a matter for states’ rights……like school prayer and abortion and vouchers and…….?
States’ Rights ended with the 17th Amendment in 1913, not with the War of the Slaver Aggression.
Remember – the rebels fired the first shot.
…on a Federal installation located within the sovereign Confederacy.