5 comments

  1. ack…i posted same at summa mamas. i knew i shoulda read me some cathlik laht first!
    is it just me or is the hypocrisy just fabulously droll dahling?

  2. That’s awful. It’s good to see, from the last couple of paragraphs of the article, that not all gay people agree with that decision.

  3. Frankly, apart from whatever local Key West ordinance may have been violated, I don’t have a problem with this. If that particular hostelry wants to market itself as “gay only” or whatever, they’re welcome to do so — provided that it works both ways.
    I do think, though, that they should make their policy clear when folks make reservations, so that no one is inconvenienced.

  4. Q: If Christians maintain their right not to do business which would promote or condone homosexuality, shouldn’t the reverse be permissable? . . . what I mean is, what if this were a hotel run by a Christian hotel owner, who had a problem hosting a gay couple; would he be entitled to this kind of action? Why or why not?
    Not sure exactly where to stand on this — the conflict btw/ ‘non-discrimination’ and the right to decide with whom to do business with . . . interested in hearing your thoughts.

Comments are closed.