Need any more reasons to be wary of the HPV vaccine?


In more than one case, the population-controllers have been imposing vaccines on poor countries that cause infertility. (ALL has info on UNICEF/WHO programs exposed in 1995 and 2004.)

Now Merck's HPV vaccine distributed in the US turns out to contain two troublesome chemicals: a roach poison and a chemical associated with infertility in rats.



In the past, when I mentioned on these blogs that the vaccines the gov't requires our children to receive contain mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and other such nasty things we shouldn't be injecting into the human body, I was labled an extremist and dismissed.

Now that this new vaccine turns out to be similarly tainted (why am I not the least bit surprised?) I feel slightly vindicated. Not happy, though; I won't be happy till Big Pharma cleans up its act and the gov't brings sanity to the manditory immunization laws.

In Jesu et Maria,

They've been trying to mandate the cervical cancer vaccine here in Kentucky. Why our commonwealth would require girls as young as 9 to receive a vaccine for an STD is beyond me, especially when the long-term effects of the treatment are not yet known. Shouldn't the so-called pro-choicers oppose this kind of thing?

Anyways, I enjoy the blog. Keep up the good work.

Leave a comment

What? Who?

On life and living in communion with the Catholic Church.

Richard Chonak

John Schultz

You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Richard Chonak published on March 18, 2007 3:25 AM.

Great headline was the previous entry in this blog.

What's the fuss? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.