Controversies: October 2004 Archives

Bishop Loverde writes a letter to the people of Arlington in the Arlington Catholic Herald this week upholding the culture of life and reminding Catholics of their responsibility to consider life issues above all others in this election. If you are an Arlingtonian you'd do well to read the whole thing.

Let me be clear: to vote for a candidate precisely because of his or her pro-abortion stance is an instance of formal cooperation in a grave evil. Such formal cooperation is, according to the constant teaching of the Church, never morally permissible.

I'd like Pete or others to comment on the canonical implications of this statement. What does it mean for a Catholic if he formally cooperates in a grave evil?

Bishop Loverde explains proportionate reason for voting for particular candidates, something that is lost on those who equate the death penalty with the terror war with abortion with ketchup being declared a vegetable with nose hair trimmers for the indigent. It's too long to quote here - just click above and read the whole enchilada.

I'm a couple of days behind on the news. Bill Cork comments on Jimmy Carter's latest failure to keep his mouth shut - Carter: Revolutionary War Was "Unnecessary"

Why not just blame the religious nuts with guns?

Linked on the Corner earlier this morning, this is an op/ed piece that speaks to the contention over Kerry's Katholicity and the orthodox Catholics who engage in the political discourse. This is a must-read for everyone, especially for those small number of you who think we work full-time for the RNC and club baby seals on our day off.

We don't club baby seals on our day off from the RNC, but Eric does run a secret empire whose sole aim is to pave rain forests to make parking lots for Walmart. When he gets a free moment at work he opens the window and discharges an entire can of hairspray in order to deplete the ozone layer. I have also heard him speak of the need for us to re-intern the Japanese. His car runs on low standardized test scores - a clean, renewable resource produced in abundance by inner city public schools. He prays the Rosary daily with his family. They implore Mary's intercession to impose a Catholic theocracy on America.

Listen, don't take me seriously. I make a caricature of these bugaboos to make this point: Our faith informs our politics. It isn’t the other way around. Eric doesn't do all those things I so ridiculously wrote above. Marines don't buy hairspray! He rides his bicycle to work - how’s that for environmental stewardship? And we don't all work for the RNC. We are faithful Catholics who believe with the Church that the cause of life must be defended. Bush is not the perfect pro-life candidate but since Roe v. Wade our only option has been to try to win by degrees.

Contrary to what one of our commenters thinks, Pete is well within his rights to write whatever he wants about what he believes is the canonical implication of Kerry's support for abortion. As a canonist he's eminently qualified to do so.

Read Archbishop Chaput’s excellent article. Read “The Participation of Catholics in Political Life,” a statement by the CDF that Chaput mirrors.

The life of a democracy could not be productive without the active, responsible and generous involvement of everyone, "albeit in a diversity and complementarity of forms, levels, tasks, and responsibilities".[6]

By fulfilling their civic duties, "guided by a Christian conscience",[7] in conformity with its values, the lay faithful exercise their proper task of infusing the temporal order with Christian values, all the while respecting the nature and rightful autonomy of that order,[8] and cooperating with other citizens according to their particular competence and responsibility.[9] The consequence of this fundamental teaching of the Second Vatican Council is that "the lay faithful are never to relinquish their participation in ‘public life’, that is, in the many different economic, social, legislative, administrative and cultural areas, which are intended to promote organically and institutionally the common good".[10] This would include the promotion and defence of goods such as public order and peace, freedom and equality, respect for human life and for the environment, justice and solidarity.

Don't be fooled by the moral relativism and subjectivism of liberalism. Just becuase you want something to do be true doesn't make it true. And we all know liberalism is a sin. So don't be a liberal, you'll go to Hell.

No, not us! But it seems St. Charles Borromeo banned all fiddlebacks from his diocese in 1572. I never knew that.

Thou shalt not kill

| 2 Comments

A rich crippled guy wanted a cure, to be obtained -- in his dream -- by killing numberless thousands of living human embryos. That sounds like the sort of comic-book villain that Superman used to fight. It is understandable and pitiable that Christopher Reeve became that man.

May the Lord have mercy on him.

Update: Fr. Carr proposes a novena.

Gay leaders to fight proposed ballpark - washtimes

Frank Kameny, who is considered the father of District's homosexual rights movement in the 1970s, said the homosexual community probably cannot stop the stadium plan but has enough political leverage to win significant concessions from the city.

Concessions? Like gift ceritificates to Ikea, free clogs, and change all the red lights in the District to pink?

What? Who?

On life and living in communion with the Catholic Church.

Richard Chonak

John Schultz


You write, we post
unless you state otherwise.

Archives

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries in the Controversies category from October 2004.

Controversies: September 2004 is the previous archive.

Controversies: November 2004 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.